Free website audit · a plan and a fair price built around your business · no lock-in

Free audit · a plan built for you · no lock-in

Run a free audit →

Legal

Accessibility Statement

Last updated: June 2026 · Next review: June 2027 · Read time: 4 min · Version 1.0

UK Web Marketing builds to WCAG 2.2 AA as standard, and applies AAA success criteria where the content allows. This statement covers ukwebmarketing.com (the company website you are reading) and the default build target for every client site we deliver. Public Sector Bodies Accessibility Regulations 2018 apply broadly to schools, councils, and any organisation receiving substantial public funding; this AA baseline meets or exceeds the AA minimum those regulations require.

1. Our commitment

Every site we build, including ukwebmarketing.com itself, is designed and tested to conform to WCAG 2.2 AA as standard from the first commit, not bolted on after launch, and we meet selected AAA success criteria where the content allows. The AAA criteria reach a wider audience: people with motor impairments need larger tap targets (SC 2.5.5 Enhanced), people with cognitive impairments benefit from clearer language (SC 3.1.5), people with low vision need 7:1 contrast (SC 1.4.6), and so on, so we target them where they fit the content rather than claiming blanket AAA conformance.

2. What we do, technically

  • Bespoke semantic HTML, landmark elements (<main>, <nav>, <article>, <aside>), one <h1> per page, properly-nested heading hierarchy.
  • Skip links, designed so that bypass-blocks links sit in the header, jumping to main content, navigation, and footer (targeting SC 2.4.1, with the enhanced AAA pattern where the content allows).
  • Target size, designed so that interactive controls target at least 44×44 CSS pixels (SC 2.5.5 Enhanced), subject to the third-party-embed and legacy-content limitations noted in section 4.
  • Contrast ratios, designed so that body text targets 7:1 against background (SC 1.4.6 AAA); UI text on coloured buttons (e.g. --accent-dark #4339c0 at ~7.95:1) tested per element.
  • Keyboard-only navigation, every page navigable without a mouse; visible focus indicator (3px solid outline, brand colour) on every focusable element.
  • Screen reader semantics, ARIA labels on icon-only buttons (e.g. the sticky contact button), aria-current="page" on breadcrumbs, aria-label on landmark <nav> regions, aria-live on form status regions.
  • Form labels, every input has an explicit <label for=> association; error messages are programmatically connected.
  • Images, meaningful images have descriptive alt attributes; decorative images use alt="" or role="presentation".
  • Motion preferences, animations and transitions respect prefers-reduced-motion; no auto-playing video.
  • Language, <html lang="en-GB"> set on every page so screen readers select the right voice.
  • No JavaScript dependency, every site we build renders, reads, and converts without JavaScript (the lead-magnet form is the only progressive-enhancement exception, and falls back to an email mailto).

3. Tools we test with

Every build goes through a manual + automated accessibility pass before launch and on every significant change:

  • Lighthouse / axe-core, automated rule coverage for contrast, landmarks, ARIA correctness.
  • Keyboard-only walkthrough, Tab through every interactive element on every page.
  • Screen reader spot-check, VoiceOver (macOS / iOS) for the main flows; clients can request a NVDA pass.
  • Real device testing, iOS Safari (iPhone), Chrome Android, plus desktop Firefox / Safari / Chrome.
  • Browser zoom, every page tested at 200% zoom without loss of content or function (SC 1.4.4).

4. Known limitations

We are honest about the gaps. As of the last-updated date above:

  • Some embedded third-party content (Google Maps embeds, YouTube where used, Stripe Checkout pages) follows the provider's own accessibility posture, which we do not control. We pick providers with reasonable AAA scores but cannot guarantee them.
  • Older client sites built before WCAG 2.2 ratification (October 2023) may meet 2.1 AAA but not yet every 2.2 success criterion. We bring those up as part of any major content refresh.
  • Long-form blog content from external authors may use less plain English than ideal (SC 3.1.5 AAA reading-level); we edit for clarity but do not strip nuance from technical posts.

5. Feedback & reporting an issue

If you find a barrier on this site, or on a site we built for a client and you want to escalate it, email hello@ukwebmarketing.com. Include the page URL, what assistive technology you are using, and what specifically did not work. We aim to acknowledge within 1 working day and fix within 5.

6. Enforcement

If you are not satisfied with our response, in England, Wales and Scotland you can contact the Equality Advisory and Support Service (equalityadvisoryservice.com). For public-sector clients, complaints can be escalated to the Equality and Human Rights Commission.

7. Statement preparation

This statement was prepared on the date above by Jordan Gilbert (founder, UK Web Marketing). It was based on a self-assessment against WCAG 2.2 AA, with named AAA criteria targeted (SC 2.4.1, 2.5.5, 1.4.6, 3.1.5), carried out with the tools listed in section 3. It is reviewed at least annually and on any significant site change.

8. Related documents

Privacy Policy · Terms & Conditions · Vulnerability Disclosure · All legal documents

9. Changelog

  • v1.0, June 2026, initial publication on the rebuild.
← Back to legal index

Free audit · a plan built for you · no lock-in

Ready to find out exactly what your business needs?

Run a free audit